[swampcock65]

[orlandogamecock]

First day of practice:

[RudeCock]

swampcock65, on 31 July 2010 - 07:00 AM, said:

He has the mane of Kyle Parker.

[swampcock65]

do not make fun of the next heisman winner!

[RudeCock]

swampcock65, on 31 July 2010 - 12:06 PM, said:

do not make fun of the next heisman winner!

He's a decent QB IMO (and a good baseball player and seemingly decent person), but he doesn't have 80% of the offense he had last year. No Spillway, Ford or Palmer. Defenses don't have to concentrate so much on two like they did Spillway and Ford. We'll see how he does. I like the kid, he's just a Tater.

[swampcock65]

RudeCock, on 31 July 2010 - 11:17 AM, said:

He's a decent QB IMO (and a good baseball player and seemingly decent person), but he doesn't have 80% of the offense he had last year. No Spillway, Ford or Palmer. Defenses don't have to concentrate so much on two like they did Spillway and Ford. We'll see how he does. I like the kid, he's just a Tater.

bite your tongue....ellington and harper are just as good and will make people forget Splinter....and in other news their defense could be the best in the nation this year

[RudeCock]

swampcock65, on 31 July 2010 - 12:22 PM, said:

bite your tongue....ellington and harper are just as good and will make people forget Splinter....and in other news their defense could be the best in the nation this year

Well they also say that Parker...

Quote

Just a sense I get about this kid that he has 'it' an unwillingness to loose, I could be wrong but thats the vibe this kid posesses.

Quote

"Kyle Parker's a winner," Swinney said. "He's never done anything halfway. He has too much pride in his performance and cares too much about Clemson and his team to just say, 'All right, I'm just going to not play well.' He'll be held accountable just like every other player at his position."

I guess they missed the CWS though, he hit a slump and couldn't revive himself.

[usc4me]

swampcock65, on 31 July 2010 - 11:22 AM, said:

bite your tongue....ellington and harper are just as good and will make people forget Splinter....and in other news their defense could be the best in the nation this year

Dangit, you stole my thunder. I also heard the other day that their back up TE is waaaaay better than Palmer ever was.

[swampcock65]

usc4me, on 31 July 2010 - 06:35 PM, said:

Dangit, you stole my thunder. I also heard the other day that their back up TE is waaaaay better than Palmer ever was.

i have heard that so much that i want to puke....these people are dunbarses...they lost all that NFL tlaent and they are going to be better??? i hope they end up eating their young this year.

[RudeCock]

Yep, I've heard a little of all of that.

[swampcock65]

they just gave Dumbo a big raise...if they tank this year they will be out for blood....but then again they are in the EZZ so wins should come easy

[RudeCock]

Here is the way I see it. Losses in bold, wins in pink.


North Texas Clemson, SC
Presbyterian College Clemson, SC
Auburn Auburn, AL I think Auburn is gonna be tough again this year, more than last.
Miami Clemson, SC Miami is suppose to be pretty good this year, and they'll be out for blood after losing last year.
North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC North Carolina is suppose to be tough this year, I think they'll win at home.
Maryland Clemson, SC
Georgia TechClemson, SC GT is suppose to be as good asm last year, they pretty much only lost their TB.Clemscum won't be near as good either.
Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA
North Carolina State Clemson, SC
Florida State Tallahassee, FL FSU will improve now that Bobby is gone, they may not make it back to Championship strength for awhile but they'll win this game and show they are moving back up in the acc (who needs to be screwed).
Wake Forest Winston-Salem, NC
South Carolina Clemson, SC We are better than them this year, finally. We have the better defense still and we will be better on offense since they lost so much. We repeat this year.

Hard to believe Clemscum only wins 6.

This post has been edited by RudeCock: 01 August 2010 - 12:32 PM

[USC2001jcb]

Pink? I can barely read it on my screen it's so light.

[swampcock65]

USC2001jcb, on 01 August 2010 - 04:17 AM, said:

Pink? I can barely read it on my screen it's so light.

me either

the way i see it

north texas---should be the coming out party for Parker for Heisman
Pres---why?
then the fun begins:
Aub---will stomp a new mudhole in them
Miami---could go either way but i see the U as improving better than Dumbo's flying circus
Tarhole---will wipe the little stadium up with them...i see parker could get hurt in this one

Turtles--- taters get revenge cause its at home

so now they are 3-3 and not a happy bunch

GT--should win this one easy...but i am going to call the upset on this one
taters feel goo about themselves 4-3

BC---taters always manage to lose one they should not....i personally think they should lose this one anyway but...they go to football heaven in chestnut hills and lay an egg 4-4 and the sheep are a hidin

NCSU---taters win 5-4 but the natives still pissed about the BC debacle

FSU--- i say Noles win a close one 5-5 and They want Boyd to play by now.

Wake---another close one but taters win

USC---normally i would not pick us but this year i think we can win it easily....
taters finish 6-6 and wonder why they didnt get Boyd any playing time.

This post has been edited by swampcock65: 01 August 2010 - 05:12 AM

[USC2001jcb]

swampcock65, on 01 August 2010 - 06:11 AM, said:

taters feel goo about themselves

That sounds painful.

[swampcock65]

i dont want to find out

[oconeecock]

I dont see Clemsux beating either BC @ BC - nor Wake @ Wintson Salem

[RudeCock]

USC2001jcb, on 01 August 2010 - 05:17 AM, said:

Pink? I can barely read it on my screen it's so light.

Well, I didn't want to use uringe, thought pink fitted them pansies. I'll change it.

As far as why they play Presbyterian? They have to, I guess Presby's turn is up. Being pushed to play these small instate schools will mess our chance up when we get our first chance to be in a MNC game.

This post has been edited by RudeCock: 01 August 2010 - 12:34 PM

[USC2001jcb]

RudeCock, on 01 August 2010 - 01:31 PM, said:

As far as why they play Presbyterian? They have to, I guess Presby's turn is up. Being pushed to play these small instate schools will mess our chance up when we get our first chance to be in a MNC game.

Presbyterian has never been a part of the four team in-state rotation we play. They have only been Div. I for a few years. We play the Citadel, Wofford, Furman and SC State. The school from the Upstate doesn't play those every year like we do.

[RudeCock]

USC2001jcb, on 01 August 2010 - 04:05 PM, said:

Presbyterian has never been a part of the four team in-state rotation we play. They have only been Div. I for a few years. We play the Citadel, Wofford, Furman and SC State. The school from the Upstate doesn't play those every year like we do.

Really?